Story 1 · Enterprise renewal
They asked to pay less. They signed for more.
The key move was letting them drop a product they didn't need and grow the two they used most.
The situation
A Fortune 500 enterprise customer was coming to the end of a 36-month agreement, with renewal due in November 2024. They used several of our products across talent acquisition and workforce management. Adoption was strong and support issues were rare. Then in the spring of 2024 they cut about 10% of their workforce. The renewal was only months away.
What changed
Several of my champions and key stakeholders were gone. QBRs got harder to run because the people who knew the products had left. Then the customer asked for a lower price and a 12-month term instead of 36. They were also openly looking at cheaper competitors and pushing back on contract terms.
The result
They asked for a lower price and a 12-month term. They signed for 24 months at an 8% increase in annual contract value. The deal closed before the November expiration, through every legal, procurement, and executive approval.
What I did
- Rebuilt the stakeholder map. The champions who stayed introduced me to new decision makers, department heads, and procurement. One senior procurement contact helped me learn who could approve what.
- Listened before proposing anything. I met with each department to learn which capabilities they relied on and which they could do without. Some teams needed specific features. Others mostly wanted to cut costs.
- Brought data to the table. I worked with Sales Operations to build usage reports for this account, based on the health scoring approach I built. They showed where the products delivered the most value.
- Changed the conversation. Instead of defending the old contract, I proposed a more focused portfolio. The customer would drop a career development product they no longer needed and expand functionality in their two most-used products. I tied each addition to what those departments were trying to achieve.
- Lined up our internal teams. Product and Solutions Engineering confirmed the new functionality was feasible and set realistic delivery expectations. Finance and our executive team modeled pricing and discount options, since removing a product changed the pricing of the rest. Legal worked through contract language, commercial terms, and term length.